How local are party candidates for the Lambeth council elections?

Getting annoyed by timewasters

During the Brixton Hill by-election campaign a few years ago I attended a hustings organised by Brixton blog. I got pretty annoyed by how candidates from some parties used the event (and the campaign) to parrot their parties’ national and international policies.

The Socialist Party called for full communism as the solution to pretty much every local issue. For most issues UKIP demanded we leave the EU. When the UKIP candidate did address local issues her positions (such as promoting private car use) seemed very strange for a Brixton local. It turned out she lived in Clapham. I wrote a blog post about it at the time where I plotted the candidates addresses on a map relative to the ward and council boundaries.

Ranking parties on how local their candidates are

This time around the whole borough has council elections and I was wondering if a similar trend exists. Visualising each ward doesn’t seem as useful as there are 289 candidates standing so instead I ranked the parties using a simple scheme: The percentage of candidates who live in the same ward they are standing in.

Parties ranked by % of candidates who live in the ward in which they are standing
Rank Party % of Candidates who live in ward Local Candidates Total Candidates
1 The Pirate Party 100% 1 1
2 The Green Party 67% 42 62
3 Independent 50% 2 4
4 Liberal Democrats 49% 31 63
5 Labour Party 47% 30 63
6 Conservative Party 46% 29 63
7 UK Independence Party (UKIP) 35% 6 17
8 Trade Unionists and Socialists Coalition 30% 4 13
9 The Socialist Party (GB) 0% 0 3

The Pirate Party only having a single candidate obviously helps them come first. I suspect the Green Party’s high ranking reflects their decentralized local nature (Disclaimer: I’m going to vote for them). On the bottom of the list are the The Socialist Party (GB). None of the Socialist Party’s candidates live locally (in fact none of them live in Lambeth at all – they hail from Kingston, Bromley and Richmond).

UKIP and the Trade Unionists and Socialists Coalition are predictably on the bottom end of the table. The big three traditional parties sit in the middle, possibly reflecting their tendency to ‘parachute’ in candidates to wards.

The gory technical details

There should be open data on who is standing in elections right? Well if there is I couldn’t find it. Instead I downloaded the PDFs that listed candidates from Lambeth website. I used the the command line version of Tabula to extract the data. I then geocoded the data using MySociety’s fantastic MapIt API. All the data and code is on github.

Does it matter?

Obviously this isn’t a perfect way to rank parties. Although candidates stand in a particular ward they are elected to serve on the council for the entire borough. Many will live in neighbouring wards of the borough, have a reasonable idea of what local issues and be capable of doing a decent job. The results do does reflect my experience at hustings though – candidates who don’t live locally are often just parroting party policy and don’t address local concerns.

One comment

  1. mchampagnie · May 22, 2014

    Thanks. V revealing!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s